Write your response in your own notes, then compare it with the sample answer. This practice is separate from the scored exam and does not affect your certificate.
Practice 1
Use LC1 and the fictional monochrome-print barrier. A colleague proposes uploading a real pupil support plan to obtain a personalised rewrite. List the four LC1 concepts and two presentation features that may change. Rewrite the colour-only instruction using route names and a non-colour distinction. State the fictional-only input boundary and a manual alternative. Record one question for a learner and one point needing specialist human review.
Compare with a sample answer
Keep scale calculation, route comparison, relative position and rainfall units. Presentation can change spacing and sentence structure. Use named solid/dashed routes and the same route table. Do not upload a real support plan to this exercise; use LC1 and synthetic facts or a manual template. Ask which step or format creates the barrier. Seek informed human input before claiming a tactile or personalised symbol conversion is suitable.
Compare each requested evidence item with the worked answer. This is ungraded practice; completion or keywords do not establish understanding.
Practice 2
Use S1, Draft A and Draft B. Work on a copy of the supplied meaning ledger. Identify each omitted, changed or unsupported claim in A. Explain why B preserves LC1 more effectively without claiming that every learner will understand it. Calculate both routes, the distance difference, total rainfall and the May-April difference. Write a version-specific review note with remaining observations.
Compare with a sample answer
A loses east, invents safe, relies on colour, changes km to metres and mm to centimetres, and replaces a defined comparison with “best”. B preserves the stated facts and asks for the calculations. A=2 km, B=4 km, difference=2 km; rainfall=80 mm, May-April=15 mm. Review the exact B version against S1 and leave interaction, comprehension and specialist needs as observed or pending, not assumed.
Compare each requested evidence item with the worked answer. This is ungraded practice; completion or keywords do not establish understanding.
Practice 3
Use I1 map, I2 route-unit chart, I3 rainfall chart and I4 calculation process in the local exercise. Write a short identifying alternative for each image. Create the map description, both equivalent data tables and the ordered process list. Compare values, units, relationships and sequence against S1. Explain how your alternatives avoid adding unsupported answers or specialist claims.
Compare with a sample answer
I1 identifies a fictional map and points to coordinates, scale, east-flowing river and both ordered routes. I2 supplies A=4 and B=8 grid units. I3 supplies April 20, May 35 and June 25 mm, with increase then decrease rather than continuous increase. I4 preserves read, multiply, label and compare in order. All facts match S1; both presentation routes receive the same task evidence. No braille, tactile, audio or universal accessibility approval is claimed.
Compare each requested evidence item with the worked answer. This is ungraded practice; completion or keywords do not establish understanding.
Practice 4
Open lesson.html from the extracted local package, and compare the supplied defective-page.html only as an intentionally poor example. Do not enter real learner data. Inspect document language, headings, captions and table headers. Follow the complete keyboard route and record focus and activation observations. Use a screen reader if available to locate source data, table relationships and worked answers; otherwise record not run. Check narrow-width/zoom presentation and monochrome print, retaining the text alternatives.
Compare with a sample answer
A useful record names the exact file/version and setup and reports each actual task. The reference source has semantic headings, captions and scoped headers plus native disclosure and skip link. The defective example demonstrates missing language, headings and image alternative plus a pointer-only answer. Source inspection predicts barriers but is not a real interaction pass. Record unavailable browser or assistive-technology checks honestly and retain an alternative text route.
Compare each requested evidence item with the worked answer. This is ungraded practice; completion or keywords do not establish understanding.
Practice 5
Run the local checks and tests if Python 3 is available; the worksheet provides an equivalent paper route. Use only copies of the fixture. Compare the reference and intentionally defective HTML findings. Read the supplied counterexample test where visible meaning changes but the structural report still passes. Complete two manual-check rows with genuine observations or mark not run. Calculate the six-attempt pilot result and write a bounded conclusion.
Compare with a sample answer
The reference passes selected structural checks; the defective page fails explicit fixture requirements. Counterexamples show that a source-data block and non-empty alternatives cannot prove visible semantic correctness. A valid manual record names setup, version and actual observation without inventing a pass. Four of six attempts were independent completions, about 66.7 percent; one was assisted and one incomplete. No general learning or accessibility improvement follows from this invented log.
Compare each requested evidence item with the worked answer. This is ungraded practice; completion or keywords do not establish understanding.
Practice 6
As the fictional adapter, assemble a locally usable geography lesson from LC1 and S1. The package must support readable HTML, a paper route and a descriptive map alternative. Retain a source and version manifest and compare Draft A with B. Supply checked alternatives for I1-I4 without changing essential evidence. Preserve the semantic HTML and native answer disclosure; keep all assets local. Run selected structural checks and demonstrate one false-confidence counterexample. Record actual keyboard, screen-reader and print observations, or explicitly mark each unavailable check not run. Write an exact-version disposition and explain the limits of both the exercise and the knowledge assessment.
Compare with a sample answer
A defensible handover retains 0.5 km per unit; A=4 units and B=8 units; the correct positions, bridges and east-flowing river; and rainfall 20/35/25 mm. It preserves the same task across descriptions, tables and print. The candidate includes all local assets and honest observation rows. Structural success is not semantic or universal accessibility approval. Unrun checks remain visible. No real pupil profile, automatic accommodation decision, accredited award or practical-competence claim is introduced.
Compare each requested evidence item with the worked answer. This is ungraded practice; completion or keywords do not establish understanding.
