multimodal · Level 2

AI images and video: rights, provenance, labels and quality checks

Ownership, tool terms, consent, labelling, Content Credentials, quality checks and record keeping for AI-made media in the UK, EU and US.

By Mickarle Wagstaff-Irons - Micky Irons

  • Level 2Getting going
  • 105 min
  • 6 chapters
  • Online course and PDF workbook
The Signalmultimodal / 02

Read, practise and review

Your next step

Start this course online

Register your start, then work through the lessons and exercises at your own pace. You can download the PDF separately. Where a scored exam is available, you will find it after the lessons.

Register or resume your course

Mickai privately records this registration and sends its team a course-start notification. It records your intention to start, not proof of attendance or completion. Our course-start privacy notice explains the details and the 30-day resume cookie.

Follow the Mickai company page on LinkedIn

You can start learning without subscribing or following. Newsletter email confirmation and provider enrolment are recorded separately.

Start with the essentials

The short answer

To use AI images and video safely, check who owns the output where you live, because the UK, EU and US differ. Read your tool's terms for commercial rights, get written consent before showing a real person, label realistic AI content honestly (EU rules apply from 2 August 2026), check every file for errors and hidden metadata, and keep a short record of how it was made.

What you will learn

  • You will be able to explain how copyright treats AI output in the UK, the EU and the US, and where the position is unsettled.
  • You will be able to read a tool's terms for ownership, licence, indemnity, training on your uploads and rules on real people.
  • You will be able to decide when you need consent and when a label is required or wise.
  • You will be able to run a quality check covering artefacts, facts, alt text, captions and sensitive content, and remove hidden metadata from a copy of a file.
  • You will be able to say what Content Credentials can and cannot prove, and keep a record of how each file was made.

Who it is for

Small-business owners, teachers, creators and students in the UK, EU or US who want to use AI-generated images and video without getting into trouble. No legal background is needed.

Before you start

  • The Free AI toolkit workbook, or equivalent confidence choosing a tool and checking its terms and privacy settings. For chapter 5 you need Python 3 (the Python workbook shows how to install it); FFmpeg is optional.

Learn in your browser · Chapter 01 of 06

01

Who owns an AI image or video?

Ownership depends on where you are and how much of the work is yours.

Copyright is the right to control copying of an original work. Ask two questions: is there copyright in the output, and does it copy someone else's work?

Scroll sideways to see every column.

Who owns an AI image or video? · Table 1
WherePosition when read
UKThe Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 protects computer-generated works (no human author) for 50 years. The author is whoever made "the arrangements necessary", usually the person who entered the prompt, says the government's March 2026 report, which calls this largely untested in the courts and proposes removing it. Human creative work made with AI as a tool stays protected.
EUA work must be the "author's own intellectual creation", reflecting free and creative choices (Court of Justice, Cofemel, 2019). The UK report judges wholly AI-generated output unlikely to be protected in the EU.
USThe Copyright Office (January 2025): purely AI-generated material is not protected and prompts alone are not enough; human expression, creative arrangement and creative edits are. An appeals court upheld the human-author rule in March 2025, and in March 2026 the Supreme Court declined to hear a further appeal.

Video and sound. UK law also protects films and sound recordings as recordings, whatever their creativity, and the report says this covers AI-generated ones.

Other people's rights. An output that reproduces a substantial part of an existing work can infringe, the UK report notes, so a lookalike character is risky whoever "owns" it. The more of the final work that is yours (photos, drawing, edits, arrangement), the stronger your position: keep evidence (chapter 6).

Try it yourself · Activity 01

10 min

Who owns it?

For each invented case, say what the person can probably claim, and one risk.

  1. UK: a teacher uses a one-prompt image, unedited, on a worksheet.
  2. US: an illustrator generates a background, then hand-paints the characters and lays out the panels.
  3. EU: a cafe owner prompts a logo and wants to stop copycats.
  4. Anywhere: a generated mascot looks very like a famous cartoon character.

Which case would you take to a solicitor first?

Worked answer

1 Probably the author of a computer-generated work, but the rule is untested and may go. 2 The painted characters and layout are protected, the background is not, and a US registration must disclose it (chapter 6). 3 Copyright is unlikely; ask about a trade mark, a separate right for brand signs. 4 Ownership is not the point: it may copy a substantial part of another work. Do not use it.

Next chapter

Learn in your browser · Chapter 02 of 06

02

Read your tool's terms before you publish

Your right to use an output comes from the law and the contract you accepted. Five questions cover any terms.

Find the terms of use, usage policy and privacy policy. Note the version or date, save a copy because terms change, and check your plan: plans can carry different rights.

Scroll sideways to see every column.

Read your tool's terms before you publish · Table 2
Look forQuestionWarning sign
OwnershipWho owns the outputs?Silence, or the provider keeps them
LicenceWhat may you do with outputs, and the provider with your inputs?No commercial use on your plan
IndemnityWill it defend you against infringement claims, and on what conditions?None, or conditions you cannot meet
TrainingMay your uploads and prompts train its models? Can you opt out?Yes, with no opt-out
RestrictionsRules on real people, voices, brands, sensitive content and labelsYour planned use breaks one

An indemnity is a promise to cover your legal costs or losses if a claim arises; read its conditions. And a contract cannot create copyright: "you own the output" settles matters between you and the provider only.

Try it yourself · Activity 02

15 min

Read a sample terms page

These clauses are invented. A bakery on the free plan wants an output for a paid advert. What does each mean for it?

  1. A: "You own the outputs you create, to the extent permitted by law."
  2. B: "You license us to use your inputs and outputs to improve our services."
  3. C: "Free-plan outputs are for personal, non-commercial use only."
  4. D: "We defend business-plan customers against infringement claims about outputs, if filters were on."

Which clause would you look for first in your real tool's terms?

Worked answer

A The provider will not claim it, but the clause itself creates no copyright. B Uploads and results may improve the service: upload nothing confidential; look for an opt-out. C A paid advert is commercial, so not on the free plan. D No cover on the free plan; on a business plan, keep evidence the filters were on.

Next chapter

Learn in your browser · Chapter 03 of 06

03

People, likeness and voice

The riskiest AI media shows real people. Get consent first, and know the law.

The UK has no general "image right". The government's March 2026 report describes a patchwork instead (data protection, online safety rules, criminal offences, defamation, trade marks and passing off) and proposes to explore whether a new personality right is needed.

Scroll sideways to see every column.

People, likeness and voice · Table 3
UK lawWhat it means for you
Data protectionThe Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) says a recognisable photo is usually personal data: a business, school or club needs a lawful basis and must tell people. Private posts shared with friends and family fall outside it.
Defamation (England and Wales)A statement, including a faked picture or clip, is defamatory only if it causes or is likely to cause serious harm to reputation.
Intimate images (England and Wales)Sharing an image that shows or appears to show someone in an intimate state without consent is an offence, including computer-made images. Since 6 February 2026 so is creating such a fake of an adult, or asking someone to make one. Scotland and Northern Ireland have their own laws.

In the US, most states recognise a "right of publicity" over identity, with rules that differ considerably, reports the Copyright Office. The TAKE IT DOWN Act (May 2025) makes knowingly publishing certain non-consensual intimate "digital forgeries" a federal crime, and since 19 May 2026 has required covered platforms to remove them within 48 hours of a valid request.

Consent that works is written and specific: which photo or recording, what AI will change, where it will appear and for how long. Let people withdraw. For children, follow your school's or club's policy; the ICO generally expects schools to offer parents an opt-out for promotional use.

Try it yourself · Activity 03

10 min

Should you make it?

For each invented request: go ahead, go ahead with conditions, or refuse? Why?

  1. A school wants a class photo turned into a cartoon poster for its website.
  2. A creator wants a realistic clip of a named councillor saying something they never said.
  3. A colleague asks for a "joke" undressed image of another colleague.

Which case is easiest to get wrong without noticing?

Worked answer

1 Conditions: pupils' photos are personal data, so use the school's lawful basis, tell parents, honour opt-outs and check the tool's training terms. 2 Refuse, or take legal advice: it risks serious harm to reputation, and in the EU needs a deepfake disclosure (chapter 4). 3 Refuse: creating it, asking for it or sharing it without consent is an offence in England and Wales.

Next chapter

Learn in your browser · Chapter 04 of 06

04

Provenance and honest labels

Provenance records where a file came from; a label tells people what they are seeing. You may need both.

Content Credentials, the open standard of the Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA), are a signed record, in or linked to a file, of its origin and edits. They are tamper-evident: changes show up when checked. Generated media can be marked with the IPTC term trainedAlgorithmicMedia ("Created using Generative AI").

Scroll sideways to see every column.

Provenance and honest labels · Table 4
A credential can showIt cannot show
Who signed it, and that file and record are unchanged sinceWhether the content is true: the C2PA says credentials make no such judgement
The recorded history, including AI steps if recordedThat a file without one is fake: credentials are optional and, the C2PA confirms, removable

Keep any credential your tool adds, and check it survives your edits. The open-source c2patool (c2patool yourfile.jpg) and the Content Authenticity Initiative's Verify site display credentials; neither was tested for this workbook.

The EU. Article 50 of the AI Act applies from 2 August 2026 (EUR-Lex, read 26 September 2026). Providers of generative tools must mark outputs machine-readably; the Digital Omnibus on AI (Regulation (EU) 2026/1744) gives those already on the market until 2 December 2026. Deployers (anyone using an AI system under their authority, except in a purely personal, non-professional activity; when staff use it for work, the employer is the deployer) must disclose a deepfake: image, audio or video resembling existing people, objects, places, entities or events that would falsely appear authentic. Evidently artistic, satirical or fictional work needs only a disclosure that does not spoil it. The Act also covers providers and deployers outside the EU whose output is used there.

In June 2026 the Commission published a voluntary code of practice and optional EU icons, and in July 2026 guidelines on Article 50; the icon guidance's examples include an empty flat "furnished" with AI. Guidance is still developing, so check its AI Act pages before a campaign.

The UK. The government's March 2026 report says there are no UK obligations to label AI content. The Advertising Standards Authority says its rules apply however an ad is made, and a disclosure is very unlikely to rescue a misleading ad, such as an AI image exaggerating a cosmetic's effect. Platforms set their own rules (see the YouTube workbook).

A good label is short, specific and visible where the content appears, such as "Background generated with AI" in the caption or on the image, not only in metadata.

Try it yourself · Activity 04

10 min

Label or not?

A business with EU customers publishes these after 2 August 2026. Is disclosure required? Draft each label.

  1. An estate agent AI-furnishes photos of an empty flat.
  2. A photorealistic generated "photo" of a flood in a real town.
  3. AI removes background hiss from a podcast.

Where would each label sit so people see it first?

Worked answer

1 Required: a real place, falsely appearing authentic. Label each photo "Virtually furnished with AI: furniture not included"; the listing must not mislead anyway. 2 Required, prominently on the image; better not to fake a real event at all. 3 Not a deepfake: nothing false appears authentic, so no label is needed.

Next chapter

Learn in your browser · Chapter 05 of 06

05

Quality checks and file hygiene

Check what an output shows, whether it is accurate and accessible, and what the file hides.

Scroll sideways to see every column.

Quality checks and file hygiene · Table 5
CheckLook for
Hands, faces, bodiesExtra or merged fingers, mismatched eyes or teeth
Text and logosInvented words; real brand marks you did not ask for
PhysicsShadows, reflections or perspective that disagree
VideoFlicker, objects changing between frames, lips out of sync
Sensitive contentRealistic scenes of real events, disasters, children, health or religion

Facts. Never let an image tool draw your data: check every number and label in a chart or infographic against its source, or build it from the data.

Accessibility. Per the W3C images tutorial, informative images need alt text giving their essential information, decorative ones empty alt text (alt=""), and graphs a full text version. Video needs captions of dialogue, speakers and meaningful sounds (WCAG 1.2.2); automatic captions are not enough, the W3C says, unless checked as fully accurate.

File hygiene. Files carry hidden metadata: EXIF fields (author, software, GPS location), PNG text, video tags. Keep what you want (a colour profile, a Content Credential); remove what you never meant to publish (a name, a place, a prompt).

These scripts need Python 3 and the free Pillow library (python -m pip install --upgrade Pillow, or python3 on macOS and Linux). Use a new, empty folder. The first makes two test images with invented metadata and refuses to overwrite.

python · 24 lines
# make_samples.py: two test images with invented metadata
import sys
from pathlib import Path
from PIL import Image, ImageDraw
from PIL.ExifTags import IFD
from PIL.PngImagePlugin import PngInfo

JPG, PNG = Path("sample.jpg"), Path("sample.png")
if JPG.exists() or PNG.exists():
    sys.exit("Sample files already exist here. Use an empty folder.")

img = Image.new("RGB", (320, 200), "white")
ImageDraw.Draw(img).rectangle((110, 50, 210, 150), fill="red")

exif = Image.Exif()
exif[0x013B] = "A. Example"  # Artist
exif[0x010E] = "prompt: a red square on white"  # ImageDescription
exif.get_ifd(IFD.GPSInfo).update({1: "N", 2: (51.0, 30.0, 0.0)})  # invented
img.save(JPG, exif=exif)

info = PngInfo()
info.add_text("prompt", "a red square on white")
img.save(PNG, pnginfo=info)
print("Made", JPG, "and", PNG)

The second lists EXIF fields and PNG text (it does not look for XMP or other metadata) and changes nothing unless you add --clean. Then it writes a new clean- copy, never overwriting, rebuilt from the pixels (the right way up, keeping only the colour profile), and prints its SHA-256 fingerprint (yours may differ with another Pillow version).

python · 34 lines
# check_meta.py: report hidden metadata; with --clean, save clean copies
import hashlib
import sys
from pathlib import Path
from PIL import Image, ImageOps
from PIL.ExifTags import TAGS


def report(path):
    with Image.open(path) as im:
        found = [TAGS.get(tag, hex(tag)) for tag in im.getexif()]
        found += [f"text:{key}" for key in getattr(im, "text", {})]
    print(f"{path.name}: {', '.join(found) or 'no EXIF or text found'}")


def clean_copy(path):
    out = path.with_name("clean-" + path.name)
    if out.exists():
        print(f"Skipped {out.name}: it already exists")
        return
    with Image.open(path) as im:
        icc = im.info.get("icc_profile")  # keep the colour profile
        im = ImageOps.exif_transpose(im)  # keep it the right way up
        im = im.convert("RGBA" if im.has_transparency_data else "RGB")
        clean = Image.frombytes(im.mode, im.size, im.tobytes())
    clean.save(out, quality=95, icc_profile=icc)
    report(out)
    print("SHA-256:", hashlib.sha256(out.read_bytes()).hexdigest())


for path in [Path(a) for a in sys.argv[1:] if a != "--clean"]:
    report(path)
    if "--clean" in sys.argv:
        clean_copy(path)

text · 9 lines
python make_samples.py
Made sample.jpg and sample.png
python check_meta.py sample.jpg sample.png --clean
sample.jpg: Artist, GPSInfo, ImageDescription
clean-sample.jpg: no EXIF or text found
SHA-256: 92ecf780af1f216ee426cd94bf5821500945e545526c4ff1f336a98fedeb7a8f
sample.png: text:prompt
clean-sample.png: no EXIF or text found
SHA-256: d22b80096c6a0502089a3e5b1cc0f1d55404f31f4778bde45693547d11764af7

Video. FFmpeg is free (see its download page). -n refuses to overwrite, -map_metadata -1 stops metadata being copied and -c copy leaves the pictures untouched.

text · 8 lines
ffmpeg -v error -n -f lavfi -i testsrc=d=2 -metadata title="Test clip" -metadata comment="prompt: a test pattern" sample.mp4
ffprobe -v error -show_entries "format_tags=title,comment,encoder" -of default=nw=1 sample.mp4
TAG:title=Test clip
TAG:encoder=Lavf62.12.101
TAG:comment=prompt: a test pattern
ffmpeg -v error -n -i sample.mp4 -map_metadata -1 -c copy clean-sample.mp4
ffprobe -v error -show_entries "format_tags=title,comment,encoder" -of default=nw=1 clean-sample.mp4
TAG:encoder=Lavf62.12.101

The title and comment are gone; encoder is FFmpeg's own name and version.

Try it yourself · Activity 05

25 min

Find and remove hidden data

Run the scripts, then predict and check a change.

  1. Install Pillow, save both scripts in a new folder and run python make_samples.py.
  2. Run python check_meta.py sample.jpg sample.png, then twice more with --clean.
  3. Copy make_samples.py to make_samples2.py, rename its outputs sample2.jpg and sample2.png, and add exif[0x0131] = "demo tool 1.0" below the Artist line.
  4. Predict the report, then run, check and clean.

Which hidden field would worry you most in a real photo?

Worked answer

First: Artist, GPSInfo, ImageDescription and text:prompt. Each clean copy reports no EXIF or text found and prints a 64-character fingerprint; the second clean run prints Skipped clean-sample.jpg: it already exists, and the same for the PNG. The new JPEG reports Software, Artist, GPSInfo, ImageDescription; its clean copies' fingerprints match the first ones (same pixels, nothing else kept).

Next chapter

Learn in your browser · Chapter 06 of 06

06

Keep a record, and know when to get advice

A short record for each published file shows what you made, how, and on what terms.

The US Copyright Office asks applicants to describe the human contribution and exclude AI-generated material that is more than trivial. A record also helps you answer complaints and shows which terms applied.

Scroll sideways to see every column.

Keep a record, and know when to get advice · Table 6
FieldExample
File and fingerprintclean-sample.jpg and its SHA-256
Date made2026-09-26
Tool and planImage generator, free plan
TermsVersion or date; saved copy
Prompt and settingsExact text
Inputs uploadedWhat, and your right to use them
Human workEdits, painting, selection, arrangement
People shownNone, or names and consent reference
Checks doneArtefacts, facts, alt text, captions, metadata
Label and publicationLabel; where and when

Keep it beside the file or in a spreadsheet. Consent forms and names are personal data: store them securely and delete what you no longer need.

Try it yourself · Activity 06

10 min

Complete a record

Record the sample file, then a real image or clip of your own.

  1. Copy the table and fill it in for clean-sample.jpg from your chapter 5 output.
  2. Repeat for a real piece, and mark any field you cannot fill.

Which empty field is a reason not to publish yet?

Worked answer

Sample: clean-sample.jpg and its SHA-256; your run date; Python with Pillow, so no AI terms or prompt (the ImageDescription was test data); no inputs; the script drew it; no people; metadata cleaned, alt text "A red square on a white background"; no label, as nothing is AI-made; not published. For a real piece, an empty terms, inputs or consent field means stop and find out.

Assessment options

Keep learning

The complete workbook

This workbook shows how to make and publish AI images and video without getting into trouble. You will learn the copyright position in the UK, EU and US, how to read a tool's terms, when you need consent and a label, what Content Credentials can prove, and a quality and metadata check you run yourself.

  1. 01
    Who owns an AI image or video?

    Ownership depends on where you are and how much of the work is yours.

    Read here · 1 exercise
  2. 02
    Read your tool's terms before you publish

    Your right to use an output comes from the law and the contract you accepted. Five questions cover any terms.

    Read here · 1 exercise
  3. 03
    People, likeness and voice

    The riskiest AI media shows real people. Get consent first, and know the law.

    Read here · 1 exercise
  4. 04
    Provenance and honest labels

    Provenance records where a file came from; a label tells people what they are seeing. You may need both.

    Read here · 1 exercise
  5. 05
    Quality checks and file hygiene

    Check what an output shows, whether it is accurate and accessible, and what the file hides.

    Read here · 1 exercise
  6. 06
    Keep a record, and know when to get advice

    A short record for each published file shows what you made, how, and on what terms.

    Read here · 1 exercise

Also inside: a 8-point checklist, a glossary of 12 terms and 10 questions and answers to test yourself. 6 hands-on exercises, each with a worked answer at the back where the workbook gives one.

The PDF is free. We ask for your name and email before downloading. Read the privacy notice at the download form. Free to download and use for personal learning, study groups and inside your own team. Please do not resell the workbooks or republish them as your own. Link people to trust-agent.ai instead.

Get your free PDF workbook

Enter your name and email, then download the complete workbook. This form also works without JavaScript.

We privately record your name, email and request IP for this download. Read our privacy notice and retention policy.

Visit Mickai on LinkedIn

Newsletter confirmation does not affect your download. Following Mickai on LinkedIn is optional; this site does not verify followers.

Test yourself

Questions and answers

Do I own the images my AI tool makes?

It depends where you are. The UK protects computer-generated works, but the government has proposed removing that protection. The EU and the US require human creativity, and the US Copyright Office says prompts alone are not enough. Your own drawing, photos, edits and arrangement are protected in all three. Your tool's terms settle matters between you and the provider only.

Can I use AI images in my business?

Often, yes, if your tool's terms allow commercial use on your plan, the image does not copy someone else's work, brand or character, any real person has consented, and the result does not mislead customers. Read the terms, save a copy and keep a record of how you made it.

Is it legal to make an AI image or voice of a real person?

Sometimes, with their consent, but several laws apply. In the UK, a recognisable image is usually personal data, a fake that seriously harms someone's reputation can be defamatory, and in England and Wales creating, requesting or sharing a fake intimate image without consent is an offence. US states have their own publicity rights. Get written consent, and ask a solicitor if in doubt.

Do I have to label AI images and video?

In the UK there is no general legal duty, but ads must not mislead and platforms set their own rules. In the EU, from 2 August 2026, anyone using AI professionally must disclose deepfakes: realistic content that would falsely appear authentic. Labelling realistic AI content clearly is good practice everywhere.

Did the EU delay the AI labelling rules?

Not for deepfake labels. As read on EUR-Lex on 26 September 2026, Article 50, including deepfake disclosure, applies from 2 August 2026. The Digital Omnibus on AI, adopted in July 2026, gives providers whose tools were already on the market until 2 December 2026 to add machine-readable marking. Check EUR-Lex for later changes.

What are Content Credentials, and can I trust them?

They are a signed record of a file's origin and edits, defined by the C2PA standard. A valid credential shows who signed it and that the file has not changed since. It does not show that the content is true, and a missing credential does not mean a file is fake. Treat it as one piece of evidence.

Does removing metadata also remove Content Credentials?

It can. The credential is often embedded in the file, and a tool that rebuilds the image, like the script in this workbook, keeps none of it. Decide first whether you need the credential, and check the published file afterwards.

What should the alt text for an AI image say?

Describe the essential information the image conveys in its context. Use empty alt text for purely decorative images, and repeat any words shown in the image. Put the AI label in a visible caption so every reader gets it.

Is this workbook legal advice?

No. It is general education based on primary sources read on 26 September 2026, and the law is changing. For a dispute, a paid campaign, a contract about AI output or anything involving a real person, ask a solicitor or a lawyer where you live.

What should I record for each file?

The file name and a fingerprint, the date, the tool and plan, the terms version and a saved copy, the prompt, anything you uploaded, your own human work, the people shown and their consent, the checks you ran, and the label and where you published it.

Write as you go

My notes

Use this scratchpad for your own notes, working or answers as you read. Notes are saved in this browser on this device. Downloading makes a local copy; it does not send your notes to Mickai.

Consolidate your learning

Review your work

Work through the exercises and questions, then compare your reasoning with the worked answers. A scored exam and verifiable certificate are not yet available for this course.

Review the questions

Learn the language

Key terms

Copyright
The legal right to control copying of an original work, such as a picture, text, music or film.
Computer-generated work
In UK law, a work generated by computer with no human author. The person who made the necessary arrangements is treated as the author.
Terms of use
The contract you accept to use a tool. It sets what you may do with outputs and what the provider may do with your uploads.
Indemnity
A promise by one party to cover another's legal costs or losses if a particular kind of claim arises.
Digital replica
An AI-made imitation of a real person's face, body or voice.
Deepfake
In the EU AI Act, AI-generated or manipulated image, audio or video that resembles existing people, objects, places, entities or events and would falsely appear authentic.

6 of the workbook's 12 terms. The complete glossary is in the workbook.

Follow the evidence

Sources and checks

Facts last checked: .

Examples in this workbook were run on: Python 3.12.10 with Pillow 12.2.0, and FFmpeg 8.1.1 (Windows build from gyan.dev), on Windows 11 in PowerShell 5.1 and Git Bash (2026-09-26).

These workbooks use AI assistance. See how the workbooks are made.

  1. Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, section 9 (Authorship of work)legislation.gov.uk (The National Archives)
  2. Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, section 12 (Duration of copyright)legislation.gov.uk (The National Archives)
  3. Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, section 178 (Minor definitions)legislation.gov.uk (The National Archives)
  4. Copyright and Artificial Intelligence (consultation)Intellectual Property Office, DSIT and DCMS (GOV.UK)
  5. Report and impact assessment on Copyright and Artificial IntelligenceDSIT, DCMS and Intellectual Property Office (GOV.UK)
  6. Report on Copyright and Artificial Intelligence (March 2026)DSIT, DCMS and Intellectual Property Office (GOV.UK)
  7. Judgment in Case C-683/17, Cofemel v G-Star RawCourt of Justice of the European Union (EUR-Lex)
  8. Copyright and Artificial Intelligence (initiative page)U.S. Copyright Office
  9. Copyright and Artificial Intelligence, Part 2: CopyrightabilityU.S. Copyright Office
  10. Copyright Registration Guidance: Works Containing Material Generated by Artificial IntelligenceU.S. Copyright Office
  11. Thaler v. Perlmutter, No. 23-5233 (D.C. Cir. 18 March 2025)U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (via U.S. Copyright Office)
  12. Docket No. 25-449, Thaler v. Perlmutter (petition denied 2 March 2026)Supreme Court of the United States
  13. Copyright and Artificial Intelligence, Part 1: Digital ReplicasU.S. Copyright Office
  14. Public Law 119-12, TAKE IT DOWN ActU.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo)
  15. Complying With the Take It Down ActFederal Trade Commission
  16. What is personal data?Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)
  17. Taking photographs: data protection advice for schoolsInformation Commissioner's Office (ICO)
  18. Defamation Act 2013, section 1 (Serious harm)legislation.gov.uk (The National Archives)
  19. Defamation Act 2013, section 15 (Meaning of publish and statement)legislation.gov.uk (The National Archives)
  20. Sexual Offences Act 2003, section 66A (photograph and film include computer-made images)legislation.gov.uk (The National Archives)
  21. Sexual Offences Act 2003, section 66B (Sharing or threatening to share intimate photograph or film)legislation.gov.uk (The National Archives)
  22. Sexual Offences Act 2003, section 66D (interpretation)legislation.gov.uk (The National Archives)
  23. Sexual Offences Act 2003, section 66E (Creating purported intimate image of adult)legislation.gov.uk (The National Archives)
  24. Sexual Offences Act 2003, section 66F (Requesting the creation of purported intimate image of adult)legislation.gov.uk (The National Archives)
  25. Abusive Behaviour and Sexual Harm (Scotland) Act 2016, section 2legislation.gov.uk (The National Archives)
  26. Justice Act (Northern Ireland) 2016, section 51legislation.gov.uk (The National Archives)
  27. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act), Official Journal textEUR-Lex (Publications Office of the European Union)
  28. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, consolidated version of 27 July 2026EUR-Lex (Publications Office of the European Union)
  29. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (Digital Omnibus on AI)EUR-Lex (Publications Office of the European Union)
  30. Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-generated ContentEuropean Commission
  31. Commission publishes Code of Practice on marking and labelling AI-generated contentEuropean Commission
  32. EU icons for labelling AI-generated contentEuropean Commission
  33. Guidelines on transparency obligations for providers and deployers of AI systemsEuropean Commission
  34. Guidelines on transparency obligations for providers and deployers of AI systems (publication of 20 July 2026)European Commission
  35. Disclosure of AI in Advertising: Striking the Balance Between Creativity and ResponsibilityAdvertising Standards Authority and CAP
  36. C2PA Explainer (version 2.4)Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA)
  37. C2PA Technical Specification (version 2.4)Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA)
  38. Digital Source Type vocabularyIPTC
  39. Using C2PA Tool (c2patool)Content Authenticity Initiative (open-source documentation)
  40. Verify: inspect Content CredentialsContent Authenticity Initiative
  41. Images TutorialW3C Web Accessibility Initiative
  42. An alt Decision TreeW3C Web Accessibility Initiative
  43. Complex ImagesW3C Web Accessibility Initiative
  44. Understanding Success Criterion 1.2.2: Captions (Prerecorded)W3C Web Accessibility Initiative
  45. Captions/SubtitlesW3C Web Accessibility Initiative
  46. Installation (Pillow)Pillow documentation
  47. Image module (getexif, has_transparency_data)Pillow documentation
  48. ImageOps module (exif_transpose)Pillow documentation
  49. Image file formats (JPEG and PNG options, PNG text)Pillow documentation
  50. ExifTags modulePillow documentation
  51. hashlib: secure hashes and message digestsPython Software Foundation
  52. ffmpeg documentationFFmpeg project
  53. ffprobe documentationFFmpeg project
  54. Download FFmpegFFmpeg project

Created by Mickarle Wagstaff-Irons - Micky Irons with the Mickai team. Published by Mickai LTD. Last updated 26 September 2026.

NextKeep going

Where to go next